Literature Reviews and Synthesis in Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) Projects
A Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project serves as the culmination of advanced practice nursing education, requiring students to translate evidence into practice. At the core of this process lies the literature review and synthesis—a rigorous scholarly activity that ensures the project is grounded in the best available evidence.
The purpose of the literature review in a DNP project is not merely to summarize existing studies, but to critically appraise, compare, and integrate findings in order to identify gaps, guide practice change, and support evidence-based interventions.
Purpose of Literature Reviews in DNP Projects
-
Establishes the Context – A thorough review helps to frame the clinical problem within the larger body of nursing and healthcare literature.
-
Supports Evidence-Based Practice – The review identifies interventions or strategies that have been tested and validated, ensuring that the DNP project builds upon proven practices.
-
Identifies Gaps – By synthesizing research, practitioners can highlight areas where evidence is limited, inconsistent, or absent.
-
Guides Project Design – The review informs methodology, outcome measures, and implementation strategies.
Steps in Conducting a Literature Review
1. Define the Clinical Question
-
Formulate a PICO(T) question (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, Timeframe).
-
Example: In older adults with hypertension (P), does home blood pressure monitoring (I) compared to clinic-based monitoring (C) improve blood pressure control (O) within six months (T)?
2. Search for Evidence
-
Use scholarly databases such as CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Embase.
-
Apply inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g., publication within the last 5 years, peer-reviewed, relevance to practice).
-
Document the search strategy for transparency.
3. Appraise the Evidence
-
Assess quality and credibility using critical appraisal tools (e.g., Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model, CASP checklists, or GRADE framework).
-
Consider research design, sample size, validity, and limitations.
4. Organize the Findings
-
Use evidence tables to categorize studies by themes such as intervention type, outcomes, and population.
-
Highlight trends, consistencies, and variations.
5. Synthesize the Evidence
-
Move beyond description into interpretation.
-
Compare and contrast findings across multiple studies.
-
Identify patterns: Are results consistent? Are there contradictions?
-
Integrate evidence into a cohesive narrative that leads logically to the project’s purpose.
Strategies for Effective Synthesis
-
Thematic Approach: Group evidence by themes (e.g., effectiveness, feasibility, patient outcomes).
-
Strength of Evidence: Rank studies by level of evidence (systematic reviews > randomized controlled trials > observational studies).
-
Integration: Link evidence directly to the proposed intervention or practice change.
-
Gap Analysis: Show where evidence is insufficient, justifying the need for your DNP project.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
-
Over-Summarizing: Simply reporting study results without analysis.
-
Lack of Critical Appraisal: Accepting findings at face value without evaluating quality.
-
Failure to Connect to Practice: Not tying evidence back to clinical significance or DNP project goals.
-
Outdated Sources: Relying on older studies when newer evidence is available.
Tools and Resources for DNP Students
-
Reference Managers: EndNote, Mendeley, or Zotero for organizing citations.
-
Frameworks: Johns Hopkins EBP Model, Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice.
-
Writing Support: University writing centers, APA 7th edition style guidelines.
-
PRISMA Flow Diagram: To document literature search and selection.
Conclusion
The literature review and synthesis form the foundation of a successful DNP project, ensuring that clinical interventions are supported by strong, relevant, and current evidence. By systematically reviewing, critically appraising, and synthesizing research, DNP students not only demonstrate scholarly rigor but also contribute to advancing nursing practice and improving patient outcomes.
A well-conducted literature review transforms a clinical question into a meaningful, evidence-based project—bridging the gap between research and real-world practice.
